Outliers
Outliers-The
story of success by Malcom Gladwell
We all have grown up reading the rags to riches stories, success
stories of ordinary people turned Outliers. We all have seen the ‘Heads’ part
of these achievers but Malcom has managed to observe and show us the ‘Tails’
part of these stories. That’s what the book is all about.
In the book Malcom has used convincing statistics,
interesting observations and great simplicity in the diversified examples of
the counterintuitive factors of the distinct cases.
Case I
Roseto Volfortore, a town near Rome has people with very good
health. In Roseto, virtually no one under fifty-five has died of a heart
attack. For men over sixty five, the death rate from heart disease in Roseto is
half that of the US as a whole. The death rate in fact from all causes is 30%
to 35% lower than the anticipated. In the survey it was found that there was no
suicide, no alcoholism, no drug addiction and very little crime. The people were
dying of old age. That’s it.
The mystery has nothing to do with diet or exercise or genes
or location. It is Roseto itself. The secret is in the way the people enjoy the
community. The way they visit one another, stop to chat on the street or cook for
one another in their backyards. Three generations are found living happily
under one roof. They have picked up on the particular egalitarian ethos of the
community, which discourages the wealthy from flaunting their success and
helped the unsuccessful overcome their failures.
A very profound lesson to learn from Malcom. I never thought
about health in terms of community.
Case II
In the list of the top 75 richest people in the human history, an
astonishing fourteen are American born in the same decade, 1830 to 1840. In
1860’s and 70’s the American economy went through perhaps the greatest
transformation in its history. This was when the rail roads were built and when
Wall Street emerged. The people born in late 1840’s missed it. They were too
young to take advantage of that moment. The people born in 1820’s were too old
to grab the opportunities. What truly distinguishes these top billionaires is
not just their talent but also their extraordinary opportunities.
The same way see the list of birth years of the IT studs
Steve Jobs – 24th Feb 1955
Bill Gates – 28th Oct 1955
Eric Schmidt – 27th
April 1955
Bill Joy – 8th
Nov – 1954
Vinod Khosla – 28th
Jan 1955
Scott Mc Nealy – 13th
Nov 1954
Paul Allen – 21st
jan 1953
Steve Ballmer – 24th
March 1956
If January 1975 was the dawn of personal computer age, then
who would be in the best position to take advantage of it? A person too old in
1975, would already have a job in IBM out of college and a person who started
his career at IBM had real hard time
making transition to the new world.
Bill Gates is
portrayed as a brilliant computer programmer whose intelligence and ambition
outshined others. Apart from the innate qualities that gave him the success,
Bill Gates lucked into the opportunity to use computers at the University of Washington
for hours on end, which no other computer programmer got. By the time he turned
20 years in 1975 he had a practice of 10,000+ hours
Case III
The other case that I liked is of KIPP School located in one of the
poorest neighborhood of New York City. There is no entrance exam or any other
admission pre-requisite. Students are chosen by lottery. Three fourth of the
students come from single parent homes. Parents of the students are poor which
is evident from the fact that ninety percent students qualify for the ‘Free
lunch’. What KIPP is famous for is mathematics. At KIPP, the belief is that a
student should not solve math questions in hurry in the initial few years. They
want the student to keep solving till she gets it right.
The question is how do the students of motely group of
randomly chosen kids of lower income group from dingy apartments in one of the
country’s worst neighborhood, whose parents in an overwhelming number of cases,
never stepped in colleges – do as well in Mathematics as the students of the wealthy
parents of kids in the private schools in NY?
The Asian, worldview was shaped by the rice paddy. In the Pearl
River delta, mostly more than two crops were planted together and land was
fallow only briefly. In fact because of the nutrients carried by the water used
in irrigation, the more a plot of land is cultivated, the more fertile it gets.
But in western agriculture opposite is true. Unless a wheat or cornfield is
left fallow every few yards, the soil becomes exhausted. The hard labor of
spring planting and fall harvesting is followed by slower pace of summer and
winter. This is the logic the reformers in KIPP applied to the cultivation of
the young minds. They kept smaller vacation and slightly longer daily working
hours.
The cause of Asian math superiority became more oblivious.
Students in Asian schools didn’t have long summer vacations. Why would they? Cultures
that believe that the route to success lies in rising before dawn 360 days a
year are scarcely going to give their children long summer off. The schools in
the US is, on an average 180 days long. The South Korean 220 days and the
Japanese 243 days.
For its poorest students America doesn’t have School
problem. It has a summer vacation problem and that’s the problem the KIPP School
set to solve. They decided to bring the lessons of the rice paddy to the
American inner city. What the extra time does is allow for more relaxed
atmosphere, time to review, to do things at much slower pace. It looks
counterintuitive but we do things at a slower pace, we get thoroughness.
The practice at KIPP has resemblance with that at a school, in Berkley,
where Schoenfeld teaches a course on problem solving, the entire point of which
he says, is to get the students unlearn the mathematical habits they picked up
in the way to university. He gives a math problem and gives two weeks’ time.
The belief is that success is a function of persistence and doggedness and the
willingness to work hard for twenty two minutes to make sense of something that
most students would give up on after thirty seconds.
These are the kind of cases the book is about!
Reading this book, I remembered the statement of Steve Jobs…
It is easy to connect the dots looking at the back. The
challenge is in connecting the dots looking ahead.
Disclaimer:
The objective of writing the review is to preserve the good points
mentioned by the author. In the process of doing so, I have used my opinion,
experience and discretion to land on a point.
Vinay Wagh
Bulls Eye, Nasik.
Comments
Post a Comment