The psychology of money
The psychology of Money –Morgan
Housel
How much money is enough?
Well this depends on a person. Anna Hazare is happy with Rs.5000 per month whereas our friend Adani isn’t happy with Rs.2 lks per second. Happiness, as it’s said, is just results minus expectations. Apart from our needs to meet a good life style, we need enough money to buy Freedom.
The ability to do what you want,
when you want, with who you want, for as long as you want, is priceless. It is
the highest dividend money pays.
If your job is to build cars, there
is little you can do when you’re not on the assembly line. You detach from work
and leave your tools in the factory. But if your job is to create a marketing
campaign a thought-based and decision job your tool is your head, which never
leaves you. You might be thinking about your project during your commute, as
you’re making dinner, while you put your kids to sleep, and when you wake up
stressed at three in the morning. You might be on the clock for fewer hours
than you would in 1950. But it feels like you’re working 24/7.
Morgan in this book talks less about the
technical part and more about the behavioural part of earning money that we
need to enjoy the freedom to manage our desires
Although money has been around a
long time. King Alyattes of Lydia, now part of Turkey, is thought to have
created the first official currency in 600 BC. But the modern foundation of
money decisions—saving and investing—is based around concepts that are
practically infants.
$81.5bn of $84.5 bn of Warren buffet came after his 65th
birthday. The results with bigger impacts come later. Do 8 + 8 + 8…9 ten times.
We get 72. Now do 8 x8 x 8 …9 times, the result will explode your head. It’s 13,42,17,728
(say 13.5 cr) and the next multiple? 107,37,41,824 (107 cr +)
The
challenge is in Maintaining the compounding discipline and consistency in the
initial few years. Later on each new day has a huge impact over the previous. Compounding works best when you can give a
plan years or decades to grow. This is true for not only savings but careers
and relationships. Endurance is key.
There are a million ways to get
wealthy, and plenty of books on how to do so.
But there’s only one way to stay
wealthy: some combination of frugality and paranoia. A degree of Paranoia
avoids complacency. Being optimistic about the future lifts the confidence, but
paranoid about what will prevent you from getting to the future is vital. A
typical way to bring it in practicality is by bringing in mind the different
ways a plan can go wrong. That’s good enough to be planned for the unplanned.
A mind-set that can be paranoid and
optimistic at the same time is hard to maintain, because seeing things as black
or white takes less effort than accepting nuance. But you need short-term
paranoia to keep you alive long enough to exploit long-term optimism.
There are fields where you must be
perfect every time. Flying a plane, for example. Then there are fields where
you want to be at least pretty good nearly all the time. A restaurant chef,
let’s say.
Investing, business, and finance
are just not like these fields.
Something to learn from both
investors and entrepreneurs is that no one makes good decisions all the time.
The most impressive people are packed full of horrendous ideas that are often
acted upon.
For most of us Role models are great in
their acts all the time and we as followers are worst most of the times.
Understanding the fact that the role models make as common mistakes as we make,
gives lot of confidence.
It’s much harder to piece together
every investment he’s made over his career. No one talks about the dud picks,
the ugly businesses, the poor acquisitions. But they’re a big part of Buffett’s
story. They are the other side of tail-driven returns. When we pay special
attention to a role model’s successes we overlook that their gains came from a
small percent of their actions. That makes our own failures, losses, and
setbacks feel like we’re doing something wrong. But it’s possible we are wrong,
or just sort of right, just as often as the masters are. They may have been
more right when they were right, but they could have been wrong just as often
as you.
Though not very convincing, Morgan
finds a paradox in wealth assimilation: People tend to want wealth to signal to
others that they should be liked and admired. But in reality those other people
often bypass admiring you, not because they don’t think wealth is admirable,
but because they use your wealth as a benchmark for their own desire to be
liked and admired.
Someone driving a $100,000 car
might be wealthy. But the only data point you have about their wealth is that
they have $100,000 less than they did before they bought the car (or $100,000
more in debt). That’s all you know about them.
We tend to judge wealth by what we
see, because that’s the information we have in front of us. We can’t see
people’s bank accounts or brokerage statements. So we rely on outward
appearances to gauge financial success. Cars, Homes, Instagram photos, Modern
capitalism makes helping people fake it until they make it a cherished
industry.
But
the truth is that wealth is what you don’t see. Wealth is the nice cars not purchased.
The diamonds not bought. The watches not worn, the clothes forgone and the
first-class upgrade declined. Wealth is financial assets that haven’t yet been
converted into the stuff you see.
That’s not how we think about
wealth, because you can’t contextualize what you can’t see.
But wealth is hidden. It’s income
not spent. Wealth is an option not yet taken to buy something later. Its value
lies in offering you options, flexibility, and growth to one day purchase more
stuff than you could right now.
If wealth is what you don’t spend,
what good is it? Spend money on the
merit of your needs, (Maslow’s hierarchy) without intentionally letting the
others know about it. That’s sense.
Two dangerous things happen when
you rely too heavily on investment history as a guide to what’s going to happen
next. You’ll likely miss the outlier events that move the needle
the most. The correct lesson to learn from surprises is that the world is
surprising. Not that we should use past surprises as a guide to future
boundaries; that we should use past surprises as an admission that we have no
idea what might happen next. The most important economic events of the future things
that will move the needle the most are things that history gives us little to
no guide about. They will be unprecedented events. Their unprecedented nature
means we won’t be prepared for them, which is part of what makes them so
impactful. This is true for both scary events like recessions and wars, and great
events like innovation.
And
History can be a misleading guide to the future of the
economy and stock market because it doesn’t account for structural changes that
are relevant to today’s world.
The average time between recessions
has grown from about two years in the late 1800s to five years in the early
20th century to eight years over the last half-century.
There are plenty of theories on why
recessions have become less frequent. One of them is that heavy industry is more
prone to boom-and-bust overproduction than the service industries that
dominated the last 50 years.
Although card counting is
statistically proven to work, it does not guarantee you will win every hand let
alone every trip you make to the casino. We must make sure that we have enough
money to withstand any swings of bad luck. The answer to those what ifs is,
“You won’t be able to retire like you once predicted.” Which can be a disaster.
The solution is simple: Use room
for error when estimating your future returns. This is more art than science.
For his own investments, Morgan assumes the future returns he’ll earn in my
lifetime will be 1⁄3 lower than the historic average. So he saves more than I
would if I assumed the future will resemble the past. It’s my margin of safety.
The future may be worse than 1⁄3 lower than the past, but no margin of safety
offers a 100% guarantee. A one-third buffer is enough to allow him to sleep
well at night. And if the future does resemble the past, Morgan will be pleasantly
surprised.
“The best way to achieve felicity
is to aim low,” says Charlie Munger.
An important cousin of room for
error is what Morgan calls optimism bias in risk-taking.
Every year there are around three
dozen mountaineering deaths in the United States. The odds of being killed on a
mountain in high school are roughly one in a million.
Bill Gates experienced one in a
million luck by ending up at Lakeside school and then meet Kent Evans who experienced
one in a million risk by never getting to finish what he and Gates set out to
achieve. The same force, the same magnitude, working in opposite directions.
Although fortune is not in our
hand, somethings are surely in our hands. There is no reason to risk what you
have and need for what you don’t have and don’t need. There are many things
never worth risking, no matter the potential gain
The most important part of every
plan is planning on your plan not going according to plan.
An underpinning of psychology is
that people are poor forecasters of their future selves.
Imagining a goal is easy and fun.
Imagining a goal in the context of the realistic life stresses that grow with
competitive pursuits is something entirely different.
Many of us wind through life on a
similar trajectory. Only 27% of college grads have a job related to their
major, according to the Federal Reserve. Twenty-nine percent of stay-at-home parents
have a college degree. Few likely regret their education, of course. But we
should acknowledge that a new parent in their 30s may think about life goals in
a way their 18-year-old self-making career goals would never imagine.
At every stage of our lives we make
decisions that will profoundly influence the lives of the people we’re going to
become, and then when we become those people, we’re not always thrilled with
the decisions we made. So young people pay good money to get tattoos removed
that teenagers paid good money to get. Middle-aged people rushed to divorce
people who young adults rushed to marry. Older adults work hard to lose what
middle-aged adults worked hard to gain. On and on and on. We should also come
to accept the reality of changing our minds. The trick is to accept the reality
of change and move on as soon as possible.
The 2008 financial crisis sent GE’s
financing division which supplied more than half the company’s profits into
chaos. It was eventually sold for scrap. Subsequent bets in oil and energy were
disasters, resulting in billions in write offs. GE stock fell from $40 in 2007
to $7 by 2018.
Blame placed on CEO Jeff Immelt who
ran the company since 2001 was immediate and harsh. He was criticized for his
leadership, his acquisitions, cutting the dividend, laying off workers and of
course the plunging stock price. Rightly so: those rewarded with dynastic
wealth when times are good hold the burden of responsibility when the tide goes
out. He stepped down in 2017.
Every
job looks easy when you’re not the one doing it because the challenges faced by
someone in the arena are often invisible to those in the crowd.
Bubbles form when the momentum of
short-term returns attracts enough money that the makeup of investors shifts from
mostly long term to mostly short term. The formation of bubbles isn’t so much
about people irrationally participating in long-term investing. They’re about
people somewhat rationally moving toward short- term trading to capture
momentum that had been feeding on itself.
When a commentator on CNBC says,
“You should buy this stock,” keep in mind that they do not know who you are.
Are you a teenager trading for fun? The main thing I can recommend is going out
of your way to identify what game you’re playing.
It’s surprising how few of us do.
We call everyone investing money “investors” like they’re basketball players,
all playing the same game with the same rules. When you realize how wrong that
notion is you see how vital it is to simply identify what game you’re playing.
We live in Copy Cat economy. If
something clicks for someone, most others are desperate to follow the footsteps.
Remember that the early birds get the bigger pie often.
Optimism talks about sales pitch.
Pessimism sounds like someone trying to help you.
Expecting things to be great means
a best-case scenario that feels flat. Pessimism reduces expectations, narrowing
the gap between possible outcomes and outcomes you feel great about.
Maybe that’s why it’s so seductive.
Expecting things to be bad is the best way to be pleasantly surprised when
they’re not.
Which, ironically, is something to
be optimistic about.
Just like a baby, we at times don’t
know what we don’t know. So we just are as susceptible to explaining the world through
the limited set of mental models we have at our disposal.
Like the baby, we look for the most
understandable causes in everything we come across. And, like her, we are wrong
about a lot of them, because we know a lot less about how the world works than we
think we do. Risk is what’s left over when you think you’ve thought of
everything.”
Imagine an alien who drops down
before the year 2000 and leaves the earth around 2019, just before covid
pandemic. Ask him about dot com bubble, Lehman bro crises..etc. His reaction
will be. “When people are the same, financial systems are the same, tools are
the same, policies majorly are the same what is causing the change?
The one who’s confident he knows
what’s happening based on what he sees but turns out to be completely wrong
because he can’t know the stories going on inside everyone else’s head?
The alien is all of us.
Disclaimer: This write up is just an attempt to preserve the good points
stated by Morgan Housel. In the process,
I have used my knowledge, experience, forecasts and discretion to settle on a
point.
Comments
Post a Comment